Advertisement
Hey Friends Worlders thought you might wanna know!
To: Friends World Community
From: Robert Glass, Dean
Re: an update on the program name change
Date: November 7, 2006
For the last two years there have been formal and informal discussions
within the Friends World community regarding the possibility of
changing
the name of the Program. This topic has been brought up at community
meetings at some centers (the Japan and China Centers), or over student
lunches at other centers. More recently, it has become an item of
concern in marketing studies of how best to increase enrollment in the
Friends World Program. As such it has been discussed at a number of
meetings of both World Council and the Council of Overseers. As the
Director of one overseas center put it to me this past spring after a
community meeting:
"the majority of our students seem to feel strongly . . . [that] the
name Friends World on their transcript might lead a potential employer
or graduate admission committee to question if ours is a theological
program, which we are not, or perhaps if unfamiliar with Quaker
terminology, assume we are a "hippy school" that does not take academic
standards seriously, which in my estimation we are not. As familiar and
fond as many of us must be of our present name, new students appear to
have strong (and negative) first reactions to the name, and often talk
about it in jest. This concerns me especially because of our falling
enrolment, and if we are to increase our attraction to prospective
students I feel we need to further reconsider our name."
The Friends World Program is almost totally supported by the funds it
receives from student tuition. Friends World has neither an endowment
nor a large group of wealthy alumni who support the program with large
annual gifts. (As our alumni often seek out careers of service to
others
rather than careers in the business world, annual alumni support totals
less than the tuition from one student.)
As the name of the program is now seen as a contributing factor to low
enrollment, and enrollment is at a ten year low, the decision has been
taken to seriously entertain proposals to change the name of the
program
before the next marketing and admissions cycle. The new name would
better reflect the mission of global engagement to those external to
the
program.
I write now to give the community a short update on the change of name
-- prominent on the agenda of the next meeting of the Council of
Overseers this Saturday November 11th at 10 am. The Council of
Overseers
will sort through the various suggestions and forward a few final
choices to Long Island University.
There are three parts to the discussion on the name change:
First, there is a discussion of the title of the academic unit itself
--
program, center, college, institute etc. It seems that it will not be
possible to use the term "college" instead of "program," which likely
leaves us with either center or institute (though other suggestions are
welcomed). Retaining the term program seems to have less support.
Second, the next part of the name seems likely to be global,
comparative
or international.
The third part of the name will likely be either studies or education,
with a fourth consideration being whether or not to include the term
"experiential."
Two of many examples: Institute of Global Studies; Center for Global
Experiential Education
As we need to have the final name to LIU Marketing Services in the
first
week of December in order to make the deadline for revisions for next
year's marketing and admissions cycle, the Council of Overseers will
make a decision at the meeting this Saturday.
Please do give this some thought, or weigh in with your comments even
now, by sending suggestions to the student executive, Paul Cox at
paulcox72@gmail.com . Paul will collect the responses and forward them
to the Council of Overseers.
To: Friends World Community
From: Robert Glass, Dean
Re: an update on the program name change
Date: November 7, 2006
For the last two years there have been formal and informal discussions
within the Friends World community regarding the possibility of
changing
the name of the Program. This topic has been brought up at community
meetings at some centers (the Japan and China Centers), or over student
lunches at other centers. More recently, it has become an item of
concern in marketing studies of how best to increase enrollment in the
Friends World Program. As such it has been discussed at a number of
meetings of both World Council and the Council of Overseers. As the
Director of one overseas center put it to me this past spring after a
community meeting:
"the majority of our students seem to feel strongly . . . [that] the
name Friends World on their transcript might lead a potential employer
or graduate admission committee to question if ours is a theological
program, which we are not, or perhaps if unfamiliar with Quaker
terminology, assume we are a "hippy school" that does not take academic
standards seriously, which in my estimation we are not. As familiar and
fond as many of us must be of our present name, new students appear to
have strong (and negative) first reactions to the name, and often talk
about it in jest. This concerns me especially because of our falling
enrolment, and if we are to increase our attraction to prospective
students I feel we need to further reconsider our name."
The Friends World Program is almost totally supported by the funds it
receives from student tuition. Friends World has neither an endowment
nor a large group of wealthy alumni who support the program with large
annual gifts. (As our alumni often seek out careers of service to
others
rather than careers in the business world, annual alumni support totals
less than the tuition from one student.)
As the name of the program is now seen as a contributing factor to low
enrollment, and enrollment is at a ten year low, the decision has been
taken to seriously entertain proposals to change the name of the
program
before the next marketing and admissions cycle. The new name would
better reflect the mission of global engagement to those external to
the
program.
I write now to give the community a short update on the change of name
-- prominent on the agenda of the next meeting of the Council of
Overseers this Saturday November 11th at 10 am. The Council of
Overseers
will sort through the various suggestions and forward a few final
choices to Long Island University.
There are three parts to the discussion on the name change:
First, there is a discussion of the title of the academic unit itself
--
program, center, college, institute etc. It seems that it will not be
possible to use the term "college" instead of "program," which likely
leaves us with either center or institute (though other suggestions are
welcomed). Retaining the term program seems to have less support.
Second, the next part of the name seems likely to be global,
comparative
or international.
The third part of the name will likely be either studies or education,
with a fourth consideration being whether or not to include the term
"experiential."
Two of many examples: Institute of Global Studies; Center for Global
Experiential Education
As we need to have the final name to LIU Marketing Services in the
first
week of December in order to make the deadline for revisions for next
year's marketing and admissions cycle, the Council of Overseers will
make a decision at the meeting this Saturday.
Please do give this some thought, or weigh in with your comments even
now, by sending suggestions to the student executive, Paul Cox at
paulcox72@gmail.com . Paul will collect the responses and forward them
to the Council of Overseers.
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Name Change: Friends World is Friends World no more!
Tue, November 7, 2006 - 3:41 PMThis was my response to Robert Glass' email:
Dear Robert, Paul and Friends World Community,
I must express my sincere concern regarding the name change of the Friends World Program. I personally have strong (non-theological) sentiments for the name Friends World and I believe there are several others out there who may share my sentiments. But personal sentiment is not why I am writing this email. I am writing this email for three reasons: (1) The name “Friends World” has been a part of this educational body since 1965 and now in a matter of four days and a couple of closed door meetings this piece of our history will be no more. (2) This fundamental change to our program will be taking place without the entire community’s involvement (the World Council and the Council of Overseers are only a very small representation of the community and what’s more the individuals that comprise the Council of Overseers is still unknown to many of us). And (3) all of the changes which Friend World is currently undergoing have seemingly manifested in the same rapid blur of vague justifications and unclear origins. At this point of no return, as far as “Friends World” is concerned, all I request as a student is a few answers to my questions:
1) Was a survey done of the Friends World Community to determine how many were in favor of a name change?
2) Where did the “various suggestions” come from for the new name?
3) Will there be actual consideration of suggestions made from this point forward?
4) Are the results of the “marketing studies” available for perusal?
5) Are there no other solutions on the table to improve Friends World marketing strategies?
6) Why is this decision being charged to the Council of Overseers? And who comprise the Council?
7) Why is this not an issue of consensus for the World Conference?
8) Will this name change be represented on current students’ diplomas?
9) Do other students, faculty, and staff have concerns and/or questions regarding the name change or the governance of Friends World in general?
I find myself frustrated because I do not feel I can effect change in face of the transformations which Friends World Program is currently undergoing. I see these same frustrations among my peers here at the LAC and I wonder—do any other Friends Worlders in their far away places feel these frustrations too?? So even though, I as individual cannot postpone the decision to allow for more community input, I do believe I at very least deserve, as does everyone in the community, response to our questions and concerns.
Sincerely,
Christina “Tina” von Roedern -
-
Re: Name Change: Friends World is Friends World no more!
Wed, November 8, 2006 - 8:13 PMI think it's horrible! I will never tell anyone that I graduated from LIU blah blah blah anything. I will never send money or support a friends World that has finally sold out.
The problem has never been the name. The problem is the organization and the way that friends World has always failed to tap into its own vast resources. What was one of the first lessons we all learned from our Friends World Experience? It was how to network. We do all have connections. For example I'm a global Studies Teacher in the Rochester City School District. I would be happy to work with Friends World and the guidance office in the school. I will not set up anything for LIU or some version of Friends World that is now called LIU something or other. It's bad enough every center that I went to is now closed. It's only been ten years. And I'll admit that's what pissed me off enough not to give money the last time I was asked that's also why I have never tried to help with enrollment. Instead of asking alumni to help sign the Friends World death warrant why not ask them for help? Not by sending a letter asking for money but by inviting them to participate in the process. Why not notify alumni about World Conferences? Why not have a true community meeting where alumni are invited to attend. What happened to the Freinds World Newsletters? If we were included in the process there are many of us that would participate in whatever capacity we were able. Its true we may not all be able to donate money but we have other things that we could give to the school.
I fear that the essence of who we are is lost. I have heard nothing but bad news. What happened to the Friends World that was never afraid to challenge authority, to stand up for beliefs, to put education and the Firends World Experience above all else. Students that are worried about the Friends World name being some sort of blight on their record are obviously going to the wrong school or they need a lesson in Firends World from some alumni that know better. Not to mention the fact that LIU can be their fallback the reality is the majority of employers are not going to care and if they want to say that they graduated from LIU because they're embarassed to be one of us that's fine. I for one am proud to say that I graduated from Friends World. Sure it wasn't all easy but it made me who I am and gave me a unique perspective on the world. I was able to do things and experience things that mean so much more than a college transcript. That's what gets you the jobs and gets you into the better graduate schools not the name on the transcript.
As for recruiting if you utilize your resources and stop burning bridges maybe the amazing alumni of this school would be willing to fight the good fight for an institution they can be proud of and that is not some shadow puppet program of Long Island University. I don't mean to piss anyone off, I just can't not say anything. I am vehemently opposed to any name change. I think its like listening to the death rattle of the school that I loved. It is also pointless because it changes nothing. Its not the name that is the problem. Better advertising and utilizing resources would be a terrific start.
I may be alone in this but I don't think that I am. I urge everyone to voice their opinion now before a decision is made.
Dawn -
-
Re: Name Change: Friends World is Friends World no more!
Sat, November 11, 2006 - 6:16 PMHere, here. The problem lies not with the name. FWC used to have a large endowment when I attended - they had an entire campus on one of the most expensive pieces of real estate on Long Island. I understand that was forfeited, and since I graduated in the 80s it has already gone through a name change. The problem lies with the continuing selling off of FWC's ideals, assets and approach to placate an increasingly conservative overseeing body, and educational system. Continue to do so and your enrollment will not only continue to decline, your focus will water down to nothing, your campuses will continue to close down (and what is all this stuff about security concerns, sorry I don't buy it - I think it is terribly "American" of you if I may. I attended the Israel Center in the middle of the first Intifada and not only did I complete my research in Gaza and the Occupied Territories but so did many of my contemporaries) and your programs continue to drift. Mission drift is one of the most common and one of the most damaging manifestations of this way of thinking. As an ED of a large international NGO I see how this has effected organizations in the international community and I urge you to reconsider.
Scott Beveridge
-
-